A Moratorium on the Use by Insurers of Credit Scores to Set Driver and Homeowner Insurance Premiums

Posted by William K. Thayer | Mar 07, 2022 | 0 Comments

In pulling up one of your credit check reports online, of which you are allowed 3 for free each year, have you ever noticed the name of Geico, Safeco, State Farm, Farmers, or Allstate (or whatever other insurance company may insure you), on the list of entities who may have recently looked up your credit score?

Did you realize that insurance companies have in the past been allowed to use your personal credit rating for purposes of determining the amount of premiums you should have to pay? Drivers and homeowners with a lower credit score, for example, were subject to paying higher insurance premiums on their auto and homeowner policies.

On the logic and fairness of insurance companies doing so, one could ponder. At least two states have permanently banned the practice altogether, California and Massachusetts. Other states, such as Maryland and Hawaii, only selectively allow the use of such data, depending on the type of insurance premium being rated (that is, auto versus homeowners).

More pertinent to Washingtonians is the fact that our Washington State Insurance Commissioner Mike Kreidler recently promulgated a rule banning the practice in Washington on a temporary basis, at least up until three years have passed beyond the end of a need for government pandemic relief. Commissioner Kreidler's moratorium is set to take effect on March 4, 2022.

Interestingly, this temporary rule preventing insurance companies from using credit scores to set premium rates for auto and homeowner/renter insurance has already drawn legal challenges from 3 insurance groups, the American Property Casualty Insurance Association, the Independent Insurance Agents and Brokers of Washington, and the Professional Insurance Agents of Washington. On February 2, 2022, these groups joined together in filing an administrative challenge, as well as a Superior Court lawsuit, seeking to stop the rule enacting the moratorium from taking effect on March 4. Stay tuned, and we will see how this situation ultimately turns out.

In any event, is this another, “Score one for the consumer” situation? One would think so, although the argument might be advanced that insurance companies will simply redistribute the burden, charging what they think is needed in the way of higher premiums to all consumers, and thus causing the rates of even people with good credit scores to go up.

But if we recognize that a laudable societal goal is to have all drivers, as much as possible, be able to afford automobile insurance, so that when they do inadvertently make mistakes and cause an accident their liability is covered and the damages they caused will be collectible, then Insurance Commissioner Kreidler's rule makes good sense.

Not to mention the perhaps questionable statistical connection between one's credit score and how well they drive.

In any event, be it legitimate or a ploy, prohibiting this particular insurance company stratagem for at least three years – as a concession to the hardship that the pandemic shutdown has wrought – is a reasonable move that will give the insurance industry and its customers, and the state legislature if it wants to take a look at the question, a chance to reevaluate the appropriateness of the practice.

About the Author

William K. Thayer

Bill Thayer is one of the founding partners of the Schauermann Thayer Jacobs Staples & Edwards law firm. Bill is licensed in both Oregon and Washington, and actively practiced law from 1980 to 2021. He is now "of counsel" with Schauermann Thayer and serves as an arbitrator when appointed by the courts or litigants. During his more than 40 years of active law practice, Bill advised and represented clients in personal injury and wrongful death claims and litigation, including automobile collision, motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian injury and death cases, dog bite cases, construction site injury claims, and a myriad of other types of injury and death claims. While many claims were settled through negotiation or mediation, Mr. Thayer litigated, arbitrated and/or tried to verdict many cases for his clients. He continues to occasionally be appointed by courts and other lawyers to serve as an arbitrator of tort claims. Bill enjoys writing as one of his varied recreational interests when he is not working.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Experienced Attorneys

The attorneys at Schauermann Thayer handle personal injury, wrongful death, and insurance actions for clients throughout the Southwest Washington and Portland, Oregon area.


Schauermann Thayer is committed to answering your questions and addressing your concerns about potential personal injury and wrongful death cases in Washington and Oregon.

We offer free consultations and we’ll gladly discuss your circumstances with you at your convenience.