Case Review: Kellogg v. Nat. Railroad Passenger Corp.

Posted by William K. Thayer | May 17, 2022 | 0 Comments

This week's case review looks at a fairly recent Washington State Supreme Court decision related to who should qualify as the beneficiary in a Washington wrongful death action. Specifically, the case of Kellogg v. Nat. Railroad Passenger Corp., 504 P.3rd 796 (February 24, 2022).

James Hamre died when an Amtrak passenger train derailed in DuPont, Washington, in 2017. Mr. Hamre was survived by his mother, who had lived with him, and three adult siblings. The mother's action was promptly settled, but under the law then in effect, Mr. Hamre's three siblings had no right to any remedy.

After one of Mr. Hamre's brothers had been appointed as personal representative of his estate, and the 2019 wrongful death law amendments had taken effect, an action proceeded in federal court seeking a remedy for all three siblings. Amtrak challenged the action, claiming that because Mr. Hamre's siblings were not dependent upon him at the time of his death they did not qualify as wrongful death beneficiaries under Washington's wrongful death laws then in effect. The federal court referred the issue for decision to the Washington State Supreme Court, as is often done by federal courts when interpretation of a state's specific law is at issue.

The law in Washington state before 2019 was that a parent or sibling could only recover for the wrongful death of their child/sibling if they were financially dependent upon them and resided in the United States. That law however was changed in 2019. As amended, parents and brothers and sisters would need not prove they were dependent on the deceased, nor that they were resident within this country at the time of death, in order to recover for the wrongful death of their child/sibling.

The law referred to above is RCW 4.20.020. It sets forth two tiers of wrongful death beneficiaries: First-tier beneficiaries are the spouse, registered domestic partner, and children of the deceased; Second-tier beneficiaries are the parents and siblings of the deceased. Second-tier beneficiaries may recover only if there are no first-tier beneficiaries.

This was the structure of the law both before and after the 2019 statutory amendments. However, under the previous version of the statute, the parents, brothers or sisters would have to prove that they were dependent upon the deceased person for support, and resident within the United States at the time of the deceased's death, in order to qualify as beneficiaries eligible for recovery.

Again, by its 2019 amendments to the wrongful death law, the legislature modified the beneficiary statute to remove the requirement that the second-tier beneficiaries be both dependent on the decedent and residents of the United States.

Thus, with respect to second-tier beneficiaries, the statute now reads: “If there is no spouse, state registered domestic partner, or such child or children, such action may be maintained for the benefit of the parents or siblings of the deceased.” RCW 4.20.020.

As a side note, the decedent's personal representative is the only person authorized to bring a wrongful death action under RCW 4.20.020 on behalf of the statutory beneficiaries, whoever they may be. Thus, bringing a wrongful death action typically starts with setting up an estate, and getting a personal representative appointed. That is why the lawsuit in this case was initiated by the brother of James Hamre who had been appointed as his personal representative, although his claim was brought on behalf of all three siblings.

In any event, what was specifically at issue in the Kellogg case was simply whether or not the 2019 changes in the law could be applied retroactively such that Mr. Hamre's three brothers, who were not dependent on James at the time of his death, would qualify as beneficiaries under the law and be eligible for wrongful death remedies.

The Washington State Supreme Court concluded that, in amending the law it was the Washington legislature‘s intent to have it be applied retroactively, and that applying the statutory changes at issue would not run afoul of any constitutional, contractual, or due process rights. This Washington State Supreme Court decision thus cleared the way for James Hamre's personal representative on behalf of all three siblings to be able to go ahead and pursue their wrongful death action against Amtrak in federal court.

About the Author

William K. Thayer

Bill Thayer is one of the founding partners of the Schauermann Thayer Jacobs Staples & Edwards law firm. Bill is licensed in both Oregon and Washington, and actively practiced law from 1980 to 2021. He is now "of counsel" with Schauermann Thayer and serves as an arbitrator when appointed by the courts or litigants. During his more than 40 years of active law practice, Bill advised and represented clients in personal injury and wrongful death claims and litigation, including automobile collision, motorcycle, bicycle, and pedestrian injury and death cases, dog bite cases, construction site injury claims, and a myriad of other types of injury and death claims. While many claims were settled through negotiation or mediation, Mr. Thayer litigated, arbitrated and/or tried to verdict many cases for his clients. He continues to occasionally be appointed by courts and other lawyers to serve as an arbitrator of tort claims. Bill enjoys writing as one of his varied recreational interests when he is not working.

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Experienced Attorneys

The attorneys at Schauermann Thayer handle personal injury, wrongful death, and insurance actions for clients throughout the Southwest Washington and Portland, Oregon area.

CONTACT US TODAY

Schauermann Thayer is committed to answering your questions and addressing your concerns about potential personal injury and wrongful death cases in Washington and Oregon.

We offer free consultations and we’ll gladly discuss your circumstances with you at your convenience.

Menu